Little Red Riding Hood Who are you afraid?
New version of the classic tale of "Little Red Riding Hood." In a medieval village terrorized by the appearance of a werewolf, living Valerie (Amanda Seyfried), a young woman who is in love with a young woodcutter orphan.
Catherine Hardwicke directing the first film of the famous Twilight series has scored more than it seemed. This new version of the classic tale of Little Red Riding Hood is a good example. Nothing do not remember it to Twilight: languid protagonists, same dark atmosphere, the same love triangle, though I doubt will be successful at the box office figures, much less be considered a mass phenomenon as it was the Twilight saga. Anyway it shows the effort he has put the film director in tracing the history, probably with the idea of \u200b\u200brepeating the success.
all starts with Valerie and Peter. From that first moment we see this Little Red Riding Hood is not as sweet and innocent as immortalized by Perrault and the Brothers Grimm. Valerie is in love with Peter, a very good-looking lumberjack, and both are planning to elope together. But the news the murder of his sister at the hands of the werewolf that terrorizes the village change their plans.
currently on the scene the father Solomon, a famous hunter of werewolves that using questionable techniques will to hunt the beast. At this time all the villagers become suspicious, because during the day takes human form. Valerie will soon discover that maintains a special relationship with the beast.
sincerely nice way to load a classic. A real disaster. The actors can not be worse, dull, flat and expressionless, without spark or charisma. Photography is too dark, but the scenarios yes I liked, especially the grandmother's house. But no sense of rhythm not get hooked, there is no connection between the scenes, is a hodgepodge of things and genres, or love, or mystery, or horror, but plays all the sticks and does not end defined. A film without grace, without a hint of wit and humor. not leave traces, either for good or for ill. Easily forgotten. 3
Beyond life
"Beyond Life" tells the story of three people who are obsessed with mortality in different ways. Matt Damon plays the character of George, a worker who has a special connection with the life after death. On the other side of the world, Marie, a French journalist, has a near-death experience that shakes his concept of reality. And when Marcus, a London school, lost the person I was closest to him, desperately needs responses. While each seeks the truth, their lives intersect, changing forever for what they believe could-or should-exist in the afterlife.
When a movie manages to transmit something, especially if that something is strong and intense score points. When I watch Beyond the life I had a strange feeling, a bitter aftertaste. I must admit that as a movie has its flaws, the pace is somewhat slow, not one of those films outright, it can be boring in some parts, but overall I liked it. I liked it because there were times when I felt part of what he saw, participate what was happening to the protagonists. I was thrilled with some of their stories, especially with the twins, and that having a twin sister felt much more affinity for them, and also because the story is one I caught and I would say the best developed of all shown in the film.
may not be the best work of Clint Eastwood as director, but it is a story with soul, shown with a calmness and sobriety that is appreciated. Although is sold as a paranormal-tinged film is really a film about love, and loneliness and empty, the left when you lose someone very dear and is not consolation. And in other gaps that arise when has been face to face with death and has escaped, though not all, of the struggle.
All we ever asked, sometimes hopeful, sometimes bitterly, if there is something beyond life, if after the tunnel they say will go to the end of this trip is something else than nothing, if there is a heaven where we expect the people we loved in life, or if possible to contact them. Perhaps in these accelerated times and skeptics, especially where it is not material and rapid consumption, none of this really interests. Eastwood actually nor pose an active way. The focus is on people of flesh and bone, and cope with their loss, their fears and their gifts, as is the case of the protagonist, rather than having a gift his own seems like a curse. It's a movie of sentiment, wrapped in a beautiful picture that exudes the scent of dreams, its slumbering shadows, lights dim, and their gloom scenarios.
Finally, an interesting movie if somewhat monotonous. I liked the transmitted message, the need to cling to something when the pace of life is so fast you feel dizzy, finding that something are the people we love or we start to love . 6.5
'm number four
ET John is a teenager trying to hide from the ruthless enemies that have been sent to destroy it. Constantly changing identities, moving from one city to another under the supervision of their guardian, Henri, John is always "the new guy" in place without ties to the past. But now the small Ohio has become their home, and John will face new unexpected events that changed her life: her first love, the discovery of powerful new abilities, and a special connection with those who share his amazing destiny.
Above Riding Hood and spoke of its resemblance to Twilight. Both films were directed by the same director, both films revolve around a love triangle and both films are directed at teenagers. Those two films have to add this, I'm number four, another film adaptation of juvenile series signed by Pittacus Lore (pseudonym of James Frey and Jobie Hughes), another of the many sagas juveniles that have emerged in the shadow of the success of Twilight Stephanie Meyer.
So naturally this is a film for a teenage audience less demanding.
Not that I have nothing against these products in a while I was consuming, but of course the time passes and becomes more demanding. Surely at one time had enjoyed fairly a story with them, but I'm afraid I've become more rigorous over the years and this movie left me cold. The story is conventional, the characters are poorly developed, and the script is average. If you have any attraction that is the fitness of their players, all of them gorgeous and the action scenes, which are the most successful of the film. But there are too inconsequential moments, in which nothing happens remarkable to consider it really entertaining. We notice that has been thinking about possible sequels and the story is sacrificed for special effects.
producers are Michael Bay film and Steven Spielberg, the former have borrowed its spectacular action scenes, and second, you may have paid tribute in his first scene, in which two guys get into the sea at night and there is something that lurks in the water. Make no mistake, despite the name of Spielberg, this is a film liable to render meaningless "and more like a dull chapter in Smallville, on which its director DJ Caruso directed some chapters, that real action movie. 4
A three meters above the sky
A teenage romantic drama tells the story of two young men who belong to different worlds. It is the chronicle of a relationship improbable, almost impossible, but inevitable, ending the couple dragging a frantic journey in there that they discover the first great love. She is a girl from upper-middle class that is educated in the goodness, innocence and rules. He is a rebellious boy, impulsive, unconscious, appetite for risk and danger, embroiled in endless fights and illegal motorbike races, the limit of common sense.
do not watch English movies, not for nothing, just that most of the time it strikes me what they offer. So it was no accident that saw her, one of my sisters and I put downloaded.
try to remember, have past few weeks since I saw and I have not very fresh. But do remember that I was surprised to violence and bravado of the boy, and the vapidity of the girl protagonist. Mario Casas and Maria Valverde, the fashionable young English film. Also I noticed the script, adapted from a novel Federico Moccia. I do not know if they have diverted much or as little of the novel, but if as shown in the film no doubt that it is horrible, it seems written by a teenager. Also the plot is rather childish , full of absurdities and sexist.
In the film the boy whack solves everything clean. You are not going through your head to reason, meditate, count to ten, no, punched him clean. Yes, it is that bad have their curiosity and everything you want, but I play a character like this repels me, I can not empathize with him and find it much less attractive. It seems that the values \u200b\u200bare enacting this movie chulito the more you are better, and that nobody joke, even if you're the one who had started the commotion and go around smashing cars with sticks. And I worry that someone, as I read somewhere, can find a nice story like this. I think it will age thing, that adolescence is a very bad thing, because it is bad, bad.
film is quite painful. The lead actress does a horrible paper, a real pain to listen to that little voice monotonous and turkey, plus is a totally flat, pointless and hollow. The guy just looks body, the only remarkable character, because really the motivation that has the character to be a pimp are the most absurd I've seen in a long time. Horrible no more, and the worst is that a product like this, so very bad, has been one of the highest-grossing English films. 2
0 comments:
Post a Comment